Meta Ordered to Pay $25 Billion for Misleading New Mexico Consumers
A New Mexico judge ordered Meta to pay $25 billion on Wednesday. The ruling follows a September jury verdict tied to the Cambridge Analytica scandal.
- 43 million-plus violations of state consumer protection law, the jury found.
- $5,000 per violation is the maximum penalty under state law.
- $219.5 billion was the initial award before the cut to $25 billion.
- 87 million Facebook users had data harvested by Cambridge Analytica.
Why it matters: New Mexico was the only state to take its Cambridge Analytica case to trial. Attorney General Raúl Torrez said all of the money will fund state education.
- The state asked for $35 billion to $40 billion.
- Meta argued it should pay no more than $3.4 billion.
- Outlets differ on the August multistate settlement: CNBC says nearly $17 billion, the Globe $18 billion.
How 44 sources split on this story
Where they split: The core dispute is whether violations can be counted by how many residents saw Meta's statements, without proof anyone was harmed.
Center coverage, 19 sources: The center treats it as a major financial penalty within Meta's long run of privacy and child-safety cases.
Left coverage, 19 sources: The left frames the case as a state holding a tech giant accountable under its consumer protection law.
Right coverage, 6 sources: The right ties the penalty to the scandal over user data in the 2016 presidential election.
What’s next: Meta plans to appeal. Interest on the penalty would accrue during the appeal, and the violation count could shrink.
- The state is also seeking an injunction against similar practices.
- Will an appeals court accept counting violations by audience size rather than proven harm?
- How did the judge arrive at $25 billion from the $219.5 billion figure?









































