Singer demands Trump stop using his song in taxpayer-funded ad.
The White House aired a 30-second black-and-white ad on Fox News Sunday featuring Trump walking through a hallway as rally audio played. The closing frame reads 'Paid for by the U.S. Government.'
- 3 government-funded pro-Trump ads have aired in recent days, per media tracker AdImpact.
- The new ad closely mirrors a Trump 2024 campaign video posted on Truth Social.
- A prior ad used a song by artist JMSN, who says he gave no permission.
- The ads are airing roughly 5 weeks before the November midterm elections.
Why it matters: Federal rules restrict using taxpayer funds for propaganda. The proximity to the midterms is central to critics' objections.
- Carol Evans, vice president for policy at Common Cause, said the spending may violate those rules.
- Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, an immigration lawyer, said on X that the funds are being 'illegally spent' on a 2024 campaign ad.
How 49 sources split on this story
Where they split: The core dispute is whether government-funded ads promoting the president weeks before an election constitute public service announcements or illegal campaign spending.
Center coverage, 22 sources: The center leads with the public and social-media reaction, presenting critic quotes alongside the White House defense without rendering a verdict on legality.
Left coverage, 20 sources: The left frames the ads as an abuse of public funds for partisan campaigning, emphasizing their near-identical content to Trump's 2024 campaign material and their midterm timing.
What’s next: The White House says the ads are 'educational and unapologetically patriotic,' not campaign material.
- Common Cause has flagged the ads but no federal enforcement action has been announced.
- How much taxpayer money has been spent on the ads in total?
- Will a regulatory or legal body open a formal review before the midterms?
- Does the JMSN copyright issue result in any legal action against the government?








































