Trump Administration Appeals Judge's Block on Mail Voting Order
Judge Talwani issued a 14-day temporary restraining order Thursday, halting Postal Service enforcement of new mail-ballot rules just days before states begin sending midterm ballots.
- Nearly one-third of Americans cast ballots by mail each election.
- 24 state attorneys general, led by California AG Rob Bonta, filed suit.
- USPS rules require approved envelope designs, unique barcodes, and voter data uploads.
- A Sept. 3 hearing will consider a longer injunction; an appeal is expected immediately.
Why it matters: Talwani wrote that states lack the time and money to redesign ballots, seek design approvals, update election systems, and train officials before the midterms.
- Plaintiff states and voting rights groups argue the Constitution grants election rulemaking authority to states and Congress, not the president or USPS.
- USPS says its rule does not determine voter eligibility or check submissions against state voter rolls.
How 54 sources split on this story
Where they split: The core dispute is whether the president and USPS have constitutional authority to set mail-ballot formatting and data requirements, or whether that power belongs solely to states and Congress.
Center coverage, 22 sources: The center frames this as a fast-moving legal battle with major procedural complexity and real logistical stakes for election officials.
Left coverage, 10 sources: The left frames this as a court stopping an illegitimate federal effort to suppress mail voting ahead of a consequential election.
Right coverage, 22 sources: The right frames this as an Obama-appointed judge again obstructing a legitimate presidential effort to ensure election integrity, despite a Supreme Court ruling in the administration's favor.
What’s next: The Justice Department is expected to appeal, potentially triggering another Supreme Court emergency order.
- The Sept. 3 hearing could produce a longer injunction — just as the first ballots are set to go out.
- Will the Supreme Court rule on the merits of the executive order rather than on procedural grounds?
- Can states realistically comply with the USPS rules if a higher court lifts the block before the midterms?
- How will the outcome affect mail-ballot access if legal battles continue past the point ballots must be printed?








































