Trump Administration Wins Supreme Court Round on Mail Ballot Rules.
The U.S. Postal Service published a final rule Friday requiring states to submit eligible voter lists before USPS will deliver mail-in ballots. A federal court injunction currently prevents the rule from taking effect.
- 90 days' notice before an election is required under the rule for states using USPS mail ballots.
- 60 days before an election, states must submit eligible voter lists to USPS.
- North Carolina must send ballots to military and overseas voters by Sept. 4.
- 23 states and Washington, D.C., are plaintiffs in the separate Supreme Court case.
Why it matters: The rule stems from Trump's March 31 executive order directing federal agencies to restrict mail-in ballot delivery. November's midterms, which determine congressional control, are the immediate stakes.
- Millions of voters who rely on mail voting — including those with disabilities and rural voters — could be denied ballots if the rule takes effect, according to the 23-state plaintiffs.
- Judge Talwani previously ruled that two sections of Trump's executive order, including the USPS mail-ballot provision, were unconstitutional.
How 105 sources split on this story
Where they split: The core dispute is whether Trump has authority to impose mail-ballot requirements on states, or whether that power belongs exclusively to states and Congress.
Center coverage, 28 sources: The center presents the rule and litigation as parallel tracks, noting both the administration's election-security rationale and the legal obstacles currently blocking enforcement.
The Hill1w+GOP election law expert: Many more ‘low propensity voters in Republican Party’ after Trump mail-in voting ruling
Reuters1w+Juíza repreende Serviço Postal dos EUA por regra sobre votação pelo correio, mas não a bloquearáPenPennLive1w+Supreme Court ruling on Trump mail voting order sparks election uncertainty
USA Today1w+Trump's mail-in ballot order gets Supreme Court boost but legal fights persist
Associated Press1w+Nothing changes yet with the Supreme Court's order on elections. But it could open door to 'chaos'
Axios1w+Trump administration violated court order on mail-voting rules, judge says
Forbes1w+New Postal Service Rule Still Up In The Air After Supreme Court Ruling—What To Know Before Midterms
Newsweek1w+Why Trump's mail-in ballot win is likely too little, too lateTNDThe National Desk1w+DOJ requests judge lift nationwide block on mail-in voting order after SCOTUS ruling
Bloomberg1w+Trump’s Supreme Court Win on Mail Voting Leaves Legal Mess
PBS NewsHour1w+Nothing changes yet with the Supreme Court's order on mail voting. But it could open door to 'chaos'Left coverage, 39 sources: The left frames this as the administration defying a court order and deliberately injecting chaos into elections to suppress mail voting ahead of the midterms.
MSNBC1w+SCOTUS ruling on mail-in ballots raises uncertainty ahead of midterms
The Independent1w+Election officials warn of potential chaos after SCOTUS brings Trump’s mail-voting order back to life
Raw Story1w+Judge busts Trump admin violating her order — as it told Supreme Court the opposite
The New York Times1w+Trump’s Efforts to Sow Election Doubts Get Boost from Initial Court Order
Political Wire1w+Trump Violated Nationwide Injunction on Mail Voting RuleTBGThe Boston Globe1w+Where does Trump’s executive order restricting mail voting stand?
AlterNet1w+Supreme Court expert exposes huge contradiction in latest pro-Trump ruling
CNN1w+What Trump’s Supreme Court win means for mail ballots
Talking Points Memo1w+Judge Clears Way for Voting Group to Get Fresh Block on Trump OrderDKDaily Kos1w+Conservative justices take a wrecking ball to the midtermsFPFlorida Phoenix1w+Active court order still blocking Trump effort to restrict vote-by-mail
HuffPost1w+Supreme Court Clears The Way For Trump Mail Voting Order In Advance Of Midterms
Citizen Free Press1w+What happens next with USPS mail-in ballots.
Fox News1w+Newsom promises new legal fight after Trump gets Supreme Court victory on mail-in voting
Just the News1w+Federal judge says USPS 'feigned' compliance with stay on mail-in ballot rule
New York Post1w+Proposition 39 is the only answer to vote-by-mail chaos
Newsmax1w+Judge: Trump Admin Violated Injunction on Mail VotingTCSThe Center Square1w+California plans to sue again over order on mail-in ballots
The Daily Signal1w+With Crucial Win at the Supreme Court, Trump Administration Has Path to Security, Transparency Rules In Mail Balloting - The Daily Signal
The Washington Times1w+Democrats file new challenge to Trump postal service election plans
Breitbart News1w+Whitehouse: SCOTUS 'Up to No Good for a Political Motive' on Mail-in Voting
Daily Mail1w+Supreme Court backs Trump's move to restrict mail-in voting ahead of crucial midterm elections
PJ Media1w+The Morning Briefing: SCOTUS Helps Preserve a Modicum of Sanity in Mail-In Ballot Madness
Reason1w+A limited Supreme Court win for trump on mail-in ballotsWhat’s next: Judge Talwani set an 8 a.m. Tuesday deadline for the administration to respond to the emergency motion.
- The rule is scheduled for official publication Wednesday; a new court order could block that.
- The Supreme Court has not yet acted on the administration's request to lift Talwani's injunction.
- Will the Supreme Court lift the injunction before North Carolina's Sept. 4 ballot deadline?
- If the rule takes effect, which states would be unable to comply in time to deliver mail ballots?